Jump to content

Talk:Al Pacino

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAl Pacino has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 21, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 25, 2017, and April 25, 2020.
Current status: Good article

Reason for not attending Oscars

[edit]

FYI, Pacino denied that he avoided the Oscars because of the category in which he was nominated, in a podcast interview published today. WTF Ep 1583, around 1 hour and 13 minutes into the episode. Apparently he was just shy and not industry savvy. sifr4 (talk) 15:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not noteworthy enough for inclusion in the main article. No bearing on any part of his career. GimmeChoco44 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2024

[edit]

Al Pacino is also a film director and film producer

The film Looking for Richard was directed and produced by him He directed 4 films and produced 3 films. Al Pacino is also a screenwriter 108.52.166.77 (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Irishman - Oscar Nomination

[edit]

Please consider modifying the 2020 section where the film The Irishman is referenced for an Oscar Nomination. It currently reads:

...he received an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor nomination. Consider revising to:

... he was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.

or he received an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor.

The sentence structure seems awkward and misleading as it states he received an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor with nomination as an after thought (and not highlighted). Brooklyn624 (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Brooklyn624  Done. The sentence in general was a run-on as is, w/ that semicolon, so I'm glad you called my attention to it. Needed to be broken off into its own. I rephrased it as "…he received a Best Supporting Actor nomination at the 92nd Academy Awards—his ninth to date." Highlights the award, calls attention to the ceremony for the film's overall achievement, and addresses his current record. --Cinemaniac86TalkStalk 16:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice... well done! Brooklyn624 (talk) 20:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]